OP09-12-2017, 02:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2017, 02:59 AM by Fuck4333.)
(09-12-2017, 02:53 AM)Zeb Wrote:I literally just told you they wouldn't be "concluding" anything even if it was implemented and they wouldn't be making any "calls" lol. If we trusted people in that position then they would simply already most likely be staff.
I'm NOT using conclude as in concluding the whole dispute, I'm saying a member of Jury concludes from what they have seen and gathered.
They can't tell Staff "I think ____ scammed and should be banned"
They should say "There is clear evidence that _____ sent wrong password, shown on this link: _____."
(09-12-2017, 02:53 AM)dax Wrote:Lmao if the jury can ban then then ogu will just become a drama ban scene, literally people will join it to try and ban someone. Hoping that u didn't mean the jury have the power to ban ban innocents coz obviously staff overlook all bans.
Not meaning that at all, I said if Staff goes off of what they see a Jury member tell them, and it ends up being wrong (Slim chance of a reliable member fucking up)
